<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>neuroscience | Waseem Ashfaq</title>
    <link>https://washfaq.netlify.app/tags/neuroscience/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://washfaq.netlify.app/tags/neuroscience/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>neuroscience</description>
    <generator>Source Themes Academic (https://sourcethemes.com/academic/)</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Comparing Cognitive and Affective Predictors of Craving</title>
      <link>https://washfaq.netlify.app/project/first-year-project/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://washfaq.netlify.app/project/first-year-project/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Health-risking behaviors (HRBs), e.g., excessive consumption of alcohol, tobacco, drugs and energy-dense food, contribute to long-term health problems, particularly among individuals who experienced early life adversity (EA). Though traditional executive control tasks are commonly assumed to be relevant for predicting real-world HRBs, recent work has called into question the ecological and predictive validity of these tasks. This study explores the predictive validity of cognitive and affective neural measures derived from a more passive cue reactivity task in a community sample of adults with self-control problems and a history of early adversity. We extracted trial-level estimates of whole-brain expression of canonical “inhibitory control” and “craving” patterns while participants viewed images of personally relevant health-risking substances during the cue reactivity task. Statistical modeling showed that greater trial-level expression of the “craving” and “inhibitory control” patterns predicted higher and lower desire ratings, respectively, for cue reactivity stimuli. However, only “craving” pattern expression predicted measures of real-world craving in daily life. Taken together, these results suggest that, among individuals with self-control problems, the real-world predictive validity of passive neural measures of affective processes may be superior to that of neural measures of executive control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details, see the 
&lt;a href=&#34;preprint.pdf&#34;&gt;pre-print&lt;/a&gt;
 and 
&lt;a href=&#34;poster.pdf&#34;&gt;poster&lt;/a&gt;
.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Devaluing energy-dense foods for cancer control</title>
      <link>https://washfaq.netlify.app/project/devaluation/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://washfaq.netlify.app/project/devaluation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This project is a large-scale randomized-control trial that investigates the efficacy and mechanisms of a healthy eating invention. Specifically, the RCT compares a cognitive reappraisal training, in which participants change the way they think about unhealthy food, to a behavioral response training, in which participants modify their physical motor responses to food stimuli to train neural inhibitory control circuits. Currently, I am working on developing a precision medicine analysis pipeline around a series of additional measures that have been added to this parent R01 as part of the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s 
&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/science/adopt&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;ADOPT Project&lt;/a&gt;
 (Accumulating Data to Optimally Predict Obesity Treatment). The ADOPT project aims to solve the precision medicine problem for obesity treatment by identifying core measures assessing a range of behavioral, biological, environmental, and psychosocial factors that contribute to obesity. My role in this project is to develop the analytical infrastructure to create and validate composites of low-cost, easily administered individual difference measures that moderate response to the healthy eating interventions in terms of both magnitude and timing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
